researchgate who viewed my profile

With such high aims, Peter Kraker,Katy Jordan andElisabeth Lex take a closer look at the opaque metric. In addition, the application also uses . Until then, you may explore other articles on this blog to acquire more knowledge about technology. With this app it becomes simple to determine who viewed your profile. Does Google Scholar link to post-print PDFs lodged on academia.edu or ResearchGate? Furthermore, intransparency makes it very hard for outsiders to detect gaming of the system. Facebook does not allow users to track who viewed their Facebook profile, except on iOS. Several people (not as many as I would like) download papers of mine every week. Now, go to Profile visits. ; the possibility of the score being linked to financial value warrants further exploration and critical assessment. It may come as no surprise that this strategy has since been adopted by many of ResearchGates competitors, including Academia.edu and Mendeley. 6. Wonderful! It seems puzzling that a score that claims to be a new way to measure your scientific reputation would go down that way. ResearchGate. Auto-search on Messaging apps (WhatsApp, Viber, Line). Can I add friends if I am not logged in to Facebook? Make sure that. The World Islamic Science and Education University (WISE) The . Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search. . So if you have any concerns with a certain metric, dont hesitate to share it with us, write about it or even nominate it for the. But don't worrythere are still several things you can do to find out who's checking you out! With these developments in mind, it becomes even more important for us bibliometrics researchers to inform our stakeholders (such as funding agencies and university administrators) about the problems with individual metrics. The US-based NISO Working Group on altmetrics has done a lot to help put altmetrics on a solid foundation, so I would just like to point out that one of their principles is also transparency and openness. Over the years, it has also been used for evaluating individual researchers. In September, they. ResearchGate is a very large (originally German) researcher community linking researchers around topics. in the navigation area of the app, youll be able to see the profile of the person who viewed your profile. That's probably the only thing that could make this app even better! At Graz University of Technology, Elisabeth teaches Web Science as well as Science 2.0. I visit Scholar profiles quite often; in particular to see the latest and the most cited work of an author of which I already have discovered a good article. Also Read: How To Recover Deleted Facebook Account. I've been using ResearchGate for about three years now. Can someone know if I view their Facebook profile a lot? After a while they added an option to send it directly, but it doesn't seem to work any more. Is it really a good way of increasing the visibility of your publications and finding fellows with common research interests, or is it just a "waste of time"? At the same time, Academia.edu doesn't look as visually aesthetic as ResearchGate. Click on your Profile Image. This kind of trivial edit of a rather old answer is harmful because it moves the question up to the front of the Active list, displacing some other question onto the second page. RGalgorithm looks at how your peers receive and evaluatethesecontributions, and who they are. as in example? Facebook asks for your phone number to create an account. 1. Her research interests focus on the intersection between the Internet and Higher Education. Impact of Social Sciences We need informative metrics that will help, not hurt, the scientific endeavor lets work to make metrics better. , rather than a site for active interaction with others. By reverse engineering the score, they find that a significant weight is linked to impact points a similar metric to the widely discredited journal impact factor. Launched in 2008, ResearchGate was one of the earlier academic social networks on the Web. ResearchGate thus creates a sort of black-box evaluation machine that keeps researchers guessing, which actions are taken into account when their reputation is measured. The platform revolves around research papers, a question and answering system, and a job board. In particular, you must make it easier to build upon your work, than on alternatives. This is notable because Mendeley readership is widely recognized as the source with the best coverage among altmetrics sources, with plenty of academic research to back up that claim http://www.mendeley.com/groups/586171/altmetrics/ Weve even hosted Peter Kraker in the Mendeley offices on a fellowship! As a result, the JIF is rather problematic when evaluating journals; when it comes to single contributions it is even more questionable. As a mathematician, I have to strongly disagree with the last part of the answer. You will receive a notification once at least 3 people have viewed your profile, We don't send notifications from the same person for 15 days to avoid spamming you, If you have any questions please do not hesitate to. Consider each of your top friends. According to ResearchGate, the academic social networking site, their RG Score is a new way to measure your scientific reputation. Unable to turn off the Truecaller notifications on my native device. Very excited to use it always. ResearchGate is a social network for scientists. No. Interestingly, the correlation is not linear but logarithmic. It seems you are asking for a complete analysis of ResearchGate. Then good things does not come easily. There is a certain amount of conservatism in research that may cause this. Of course, using ResearchGate in this way is only worth it if a large-ish proportion of researchers in your sub-fields are on the site. As far as Linkedin is concerned, I have people who follow me, but I haven't had any work opportunities. The results were presented at a recent workshop on Analysing and Quantifying Scholarly Communication on the Web (ASCW15 , ResearchGate thus creates a sort of black-box evaluation machine that keeps researchers guessing, which actions are taken into account when their reputation is measured. But even this possibility does not change my bottom line view. I think it could still be quite more useful if some functionalities were added (maybe adding the ability to create, announce, and promote -la-Facebook events, which means conferences, workshops, symposiums, etc., for instance), but it is actually becoming the social network for scientific researchers, in my humble perception. http://www.niso.org/topics/tl/altmetrics_initiative/, http://www.mendeley.com/groups/586171/altmetrics/, The ResearchGate Score: a good example of a bad metric | Nader Ale Ebrahim, ResearchGate Score: Good Example of a Bad Metric, Weekend reads: What do PhDs earn? Note: Number, email, and addresses are not visible until you . Was looking for something like this. A critical look at theResearchGateScore as a measure of scientific reputation. data, slides) is definitely a step into the right direction, and the idea of considering interactions when thinking about academic reputation has some merit. Skills describe the expertise, methods, and techniques you use in your research and help identify specialists in specific fields. To find out more about cookies and change your preferences, visit our, Series: Rapid Response Publishing in Covid Times, Subscribe to the Impact Blog via Email or RSS. This is exemplified by, in ResearchGates own question and answering system pertaining to the exact calculation of the RG Score. It's hard to predict how this will develop in the future. Make it available. We take personal data and anti-spam policies very seriously; our processes are compliant with European and U.S. regulations and are audited on a regular basis. One of the principles of the Leiden Manifesto states for example: Keep data collection and analytical processes open, transparent and simple, and it continues: Recent commercial entrants should be held to the same standards; no one should accept a black-box evaluation machine. Transparency is the only way measures can be put into context and the only way biases which are inherent in all socially created metrics can be uncovered. Basically, it's entirely up to you and how you want your information to be spread! As is, I have yet to hear any positive success stories from my peers. Step 3. Are you wondering who your stalker is or perhaps an admirer viewing your Facebook profile? ResearchGATE | , #DeleteAcademicSocialNetworks ? Finally, it should be pointed out that the RG Score is not the only bad metric out there. Visit our sister blog LSE Review of Books. Last Updated: January 18, 2023 Share Improve this answer edited Sep 6, 2022 at 21:49 Melanie Shebel Impact points proved to be very relevant; for this exploratory sample at least, impact points accounted for a large proportion of the variation in the data (68%). Unfortunately, that is not enough information to reproduce ones own score. Its not and we continue to work with the DOI Event Tracker (DET) team at Crossref to make sure this will never be the case. I was never a member of ResearchGate or tried to be one. Most highly significant findings are only recognised when re-visited, years after they were published. All you have to do is, read this article with the utmost attention to learn how to see who views your Facebook. You must work to find people with relevant work for you, and follow them (and also occasionally unfollow some people) - so that you get a minimally lively and relevant news feed. I personally recommend having your own academic profile on the following social networks/tools: Twitter, A simple and fast way to share short messages, interesting pieces of info, etc. The high number of messages prove to be very successful for ResearchGate: according to a study by Nature from 2014, ResearchGate is the most well known social network among researchers; 35% of surveyed researchers say that they signed up for ResearchGate because they received an e-mail. My citation number in Google Scholar are in the thousand and in ResearchGate they shrink badly to less than 311. We generate only one view per person even if a user views any particular contact multiple times in a day. Go to Facebook.com and log in to your account. However, there is a mismatch between the goal of the RG Score and use of the site in practice. Transparency in metrics is the only way scholarly measures can be put into context and the only way biases which are inherent in all socially created metrics can be uncovered. 3. So it is better you revise and restrict your question. Get all latest content delivered straight to your inbox. We use cookies to make wikiHow great. Impact of Social Sciences Context is everything: Making the case for more nuanced citation impact measures. We need informative metrics that will help, not hurt, the scientific endeavor lets work to make metrics better. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top, Not the answer you're looking for? How to see who views your Facebook profile the most 1. 4. Review the top 10 to 20 results. are patent descriptions/images in public domain? How to Integrate Your ORCID iD into ResearchGate. I finally feel like the site is going down the right path. How do I sort my contacts by "Last name - First name"? If you sign up (or are already signed up), make sure to carefully check all settings. Even if they seem legitimate, they are all fraudulent and may steal your sensitive information. peace . {"smallUrl":"https:\/\/www.wikihow.com\/images\/thumb\/a\/a6\/See-Who-Views-Your-Facebook-Profile-Step-12-Version-4.jpg\/v4-460px-See-Who-Views-Your-Facebook-Profile-Step-12-Version-4.jpg","bigUrl":"\/images\/thumb\/a\/a6\/See-Who-Views-Your-Facebook-Profile-Step-12-Version-4.jpg\/aid2904241-v4-728px-See-Who-Views-Your-Facebook-Profile-Step-12-Version-4.jpg","smallWidth":460,"smallHeight":345,"bigWidth":728,"bigHeight":546,"licensing":"