Which type of jurisdiction do federal trial courts have? 299, 92 L.Ed. It was only necessary for the court to say in Brown that equality in fact was not a possibility under a policy of separation because to separate children in public schools "from others of similar age and qualifications solely because of their race generates a feeling of inferiority as to their status in the community that may affect their hearts and minds in a way unlikely ever to be undone." 389, 390, 92 L.Ed. Painter is a landmark decision that began a robust use of the Equal Protection Clause to stop State governments from disadvantaging people based on race. For example, following the win with the Gaines case, Lloyd L. Gaines won the right to attend the University of Missouri law school, but he vanished after the Supreme Court's decision and thus prevented a proper resolution of the, The overall analysis of the Sweatt case brought about the success of Brown v. Board of Education. The Board of Education made it difficult for him to do this. 2020 The University of Texas at Austin. Required fields are marked *. In the Brown case laws establishing racial segregation were deemed unconstitutional. Based on the Texas constitution, the university registrar rejected his application because Sweatt was black and the University of Texas was a segregated institution. 2643b, 2719, 2900 (Vernon, 1925 and Supp.). Sweatt sued the university requesting a writ of mandamus, which is an order issued by a court of higher authority to command a lower court or state official to do something. Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad Co. Harper v. Virginia State Board of Elections, San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez, Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. Murgia, New York City Transit Authority v. Beazer. 849. It may be argued that excluding petitioner from that school is no different from excluding white students from the new law school. The case of Brown versus the Board of education was one of the most significant cases because this case was the stepping stone to the justices of previous cases that were ruled against for the fourteen amendment for many minorities. Ferguson.". Under those circumstances, the state actions violated the law. In the Sweatt case, one man sued due to not being accepted into a law school based on the color of his skin. 2 answers. Still, on the university's campus in Austin, ask about Heman Sweatt, and you often get blank stares. Such restrictions impair and inhibit his ability to study, to engage in discussions and exchange views with other students, and, in general, to learn his profession.". This case and McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents, 339 U.S. 637, 70 S.Ct. The case in which the Supreme Court affirmed a role for the national government - the executive branch - to play regarding the treatment of workers was. Arts. The Evolving 'Separate But Equal' Education Jurisprudence from Cumming to Brown" by Mark Strasser, "'What Starts Here Changes the World': The Historical Significance of the U.S. Supreme Court Decision in Sweatt v. Painter" by David A. Furlow. Link is to ProQuest (login required). Racial separation by force of law was a historic custom in the United States until the decision of Sweatt v. Painter by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1950. **849 This case and McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents, 339 U.S. 637, 70 S. Ct. 851, present different aspects of this general question: To what extent does the Equal . See Tex.Const. Petitioner was denied admission to the state supported University of Texas Law School, solely because he is a Negro and state law forbids the admission of Negroes to that Law School. 'Students of the interim School of Law of the Texas State University for Negroes (located in Austin, whereas the permanent School was to be located at Houston) shall have use of the State Law Library in the Capitol Building * * *.' With Sweatt v. Painter and McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education, the Supreme Court began to overturn the separate but equal doctrine in public education by requiring graduate and professional schools to admit black students. Lavergne adds to this statement when he asserts that Sweatt became the single-most valuable precedent for explicitly ending racial segregation in Brown only four years later. This entry belongs to the following Handbook Special Projects: We are a community-supported, non-profit organization and we humbly ask for your support because the careful and accurate recording of our history has never been more important. Sweatt v.Painter and Brown v.Board of Education are similar regarding education, attorney, public school, and segregation in public places.Thus, options A, B, C, and F are correct.. What is Sweatt v. Painter? View Case: Sweatt v. Painter, 339 U.S. 629 (1950) The Supreme Court started to undermine the inherently unequal principle in public schooling with Sweatt v. Painter by ordering graduate and specialized colleges to allow black applicants. The newly created school for African-Americans, by contrast, had five professors, 23 students, a library with 16,500 volumes, a legal aid association, and one alumnus admitted to the Texas Bar. Nor need we reach petitioner's contention that Plessy v. Ferguson should be reexamined in the light of contemporary knowledge respecting the purposes of the Fourteenth Amendment and the effects of racial segregation. Both students sued, and the U.S. Supreme Court ultimately ruled that dividing students by race in graduate programs fell short of the legal standard of separate but equal. It is a case that really helped put one of the final nails in the coffin of state. This Court has stated unanimously that 'The State must provide (legal education) for (petitioner) in conformity with the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and provide it as soon as it does for applicants of any other group.' With assistance from NAACP counsel, Sweatt sued in state court, requesting that the court require state and university officials to enroll him. Linda Browns father wanted the best for her, so he wanted the best-educated school for her. The 'separate' law school and the college became the Thurgood Marshall School of Law at Texas Southern University (known then as "Texas State University for Negroes"). Their goal was to secure the rights, for all people, guaranteed to people in the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments in the United States Constitution. Sweatt v. Painter (1950) and McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents (1950) Rather than admit Heman Sweatt to its law school, the state of Texas offered to create a separate program for African Americans. Because of this traditional reluctance to extend constitutional interpretations to situations or facts which are not before the Court, much of the excellent research and detailed argument presented in these cases is unnecessary to their disposition. That such a claim, if made, would be dishonored by the State, is no answer. As the Supreme Court hears a new case involving affirmative action at the University of Texas, some remember a legal battle from 62 years ago that paved the way for Brown v. Board of Education. Board of Education differ from the legal questions in earlier rulings such as Sweatt v. Ferguson and ruled that facilities separated by race were not and could not be equal. The library contained over 65,000 volumes. Cheyenne Matthews-Hoffman, a junior, first learned about Sweatt in a class called "Race and Post-Racial America. 1138, 41 L.Ed. McLaurin once again filed suit, claiming that this segregation violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Those who sought to challenge segregation in public education before Sweatt v. Painter did so primarily by contending that there was in the particular situation in question gross inequality of facilities or a complete failure to provide African Americans with higher education of the type in issue. This guide is designed to help patrons find materials on the case Sweatt v. Painter, 339 U.S. 629 (1950). On October 13, 1948, McLaurin entered the University. The NAACP was created in 1909 and stands for the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People. At that time, Article VII, Section 7 of the Texas Constitution read: "Separate schools shall be provided for the white and colored children, and impartial provision shall be made for both." Dolph Briscoe Center for American History We need your support because we are a non-profit organization that relies upon contributions from our community in order to record and preserve the history of our state. At the same time the Supreme Court considered theSweattcase, it reviewed the policies of the University of Oklahoma in McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education. In order to be hired by Duke Power co., one had to have a High-School graduate diploma, scores on an IQ test equal to that of a normal High-School graduate. The judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded for proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion. Painter was a pivotal event in the history of The University of Texas School of Law and in the civil rights movement in the United States. In 1909 blacks and whites, led by W. E. B. DuBois and Arthur and Joe Spingarn, formed the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), an organization dedicated to fighting for racial equality and ending segregation. Marshall would go on to build a case around the idea of intangibles. The university is arguing today that a diverse student body promotes a robust exchange of ideas, and that in turn helps prepare students for a future in which they'll encounter people of all backgrounds. Denied admission, Gaines was offered a scholarship to an out-of-state school. The District Court denied Sweatts petition for an order directing his admission to the Universitys Law School and gave the state six months to provide a law school for African-American students. In Waldo E. Martin Jrs book, Brown v. Board of Education, he explained the NAACPs legal strategy in its various cases against Jim Crow. He sued school officials alleging a violation of. Anti-black riots killed or injured over one hundred black civilians. Sweatt was denied admission solely because he was a Negro and state law forbids the admission of Negros to that law school. It is difficult to believe that one who had a free choice between these law schools would consider the question close. Signup today for our free newsletter, Especially Texan. ? Brown v. Board of Education was a landmark case that was decided by the Supreme Court of America in 1954. Can a State distinguish between students of different races in professional and graduate educational institutions consistent with the Equal Protection Clause? (Andrea Hsu is an All Things Considered producer. 208, the Court, speaking through Chief Justice Hughes, declared that 'petitioner's right was a personal one. Whether the University of Texas Law School is compared with the original or the new law school for Negroes, we cannot find substantial equality in the educational opportunities offered white and Negro law students by the State. Changes were then made to the Fourteenth Amendments Equal Protection Clause. His application was rejected solely because he is a Negro.1 Petitioner thereupon brought this suit for mandamus against the appropriate school officials, respondents here, to compel his admission. Sweatt appealed the dismissal of the case to the United States Supreme Court, claiming that the Texas admissions scheme continued to violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Sipuel v. Board of Regents of Univ. This paper explains a very important moment in the history of our government that took place in Illinois in 1917. Art. Vertical Files, Dolph Briscoe Center for American History, University of Texas at Austin (Almetris Duren, Heman M. Sweatt). In the fall of 1950 Herman Marion Sweatt tried to enroll in the state-supported University of Texas law school. c : 102 Ph Vin , B , Long Bin. https://www.tshaonline.org/handbook/entries/sweatt-v-painter. The NAACP was founded in response to the 1908 race riot in Springfield, Illinois and the terrible practice known as lynching. On June 5, 1950, the court ruled unanimously that under the Equal Protection Clause, Sweatt must be admitted to the university. 1666, and cases cited therein. Sellers upheld the constitutionality of segregation in education, but added that if separate but equal facilities could not be provided, Sweatt must be admitted to UT's law school. The case had a direct impact on the University of Texas because it permitted black applicants to apply to graduate and professional programs. 44. Out of all the families now involved in the, Furthermore, the Sweatt case showed the NAACP strategy could prevail in the courts. The University of Texas Law School had 16 full-time and 3 part-time professors, while the black law school had 5 full-time professors. 2020 The University of Texas at Austin. Decided June 5, 1950. . Thurgood Marshall Law Review 36, no. Such qualities, to name but a few, include reputation of the faculty, experience of the administration, position and influence of the alumni, standing in the communicty, traditions and prestige. The State of Alabama had effectively barred the NAACP from operating in Alabama by requiring it to give the state a list of its members. Instead of purposely putting blacks that they hired into the labor department, they made requirements for Hiring, promotions and transfers. 592008 How does the Brown v. Heman Marion Sweatt 1912-1982 an African American postal worker from Houston was denied admission to The University of Texas School of Law in 1946. On that ground he was denied admission pursuant to Article VII, Section 7, of the Texas Constitution, which read: "Separate schools shall be provided for the white and colored children, and impartial provision shall be made for both." 3 answers. 5172019 The case of Sweatt v. Board of Education May 17 1954 This landmark Supreme Court decision overturned the 1896 ruling in the case of Plessey v. Painter 1950 Herman Sweatt was rejected from the University of Texas Law School because he was black. Cng ty em ang lm th ng k, How Do You Remove Paint From Concrete Floor, Em xin php ng tuyn Board of Educationand enforced by the executive branch changed their lives and America forever. -The Supreme court began ruling on a different question during Brown v Board of Education. Painter 1950 and McLaurin v. Can separate but equal ever be. Few students and no one who has practiced law would choose to study in an academic vacuum, removed from the interplay of ideas and the exchange of views with which the law is concerned. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill, Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health, Cumming v. Richmond County Board of Education, Sipuel v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma, Davis v. County School Board of Prince Edward County, Griffin v. County School Board of Prince Edward County, United States v. Montgomery County Board of Education, Alexander v. Holmes County Board of Education, Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education. "The modern law school is operated so the student can understand ideas of all stratas of society, so he can go out and be of service to his community, his state and his nation," argued Marshall, a future Supreme Court justice. ), Fisher v. the University of Texas at Austin, Dolph Briscoe Center for American History, At U. View Case:Sweattv. Painter, 339 U.S. 629 (1950), Graduate College, University of Oklahoma. ), note to Art. Texas State Historical Association (TSHA) The selected plaintiff had to be willing to disrupt their lives with constant meetings and court appearances for an extended amount of time, to possibly could include several years. Following an initial court proceeding, the university offered petitioner enrollment in a new law school specifically for African-American law students. https://www.tshaonline.org, https://www.tshaonline.org/handbook/entries/sweatt-v-painter. On February 12, 1909, the NAACP, National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, was founded. Used with permission. To order, visit www.firelightmedia.org, call 1-800 . One of these court cases was 1970s Griggs v. Duke Power co. (link to the NAACP LDF article) Six years after congress passed Title VII of the civil rights act, making it illegal for companies and business to segregate and discriminate based on race, After Title Seven of the civil rights act was written, Duke power had to change the way they hired and worked their employees. 2 (2004): 1924. This led them to imply the Equal Protection Law that claims no state has the right to deny anyone within the jurisdiction equal protection of the, Writing for the court, Chief Justice Earl Warren argued that the question of whether racially segregated public schools were inherently unequal, and thus beyond the scope of the separate but equal doctrine, could be answered only by considering the effect of segregation itself on public education. Citing the Supreme Courts rulings in Sweat v. Painter (1950), and McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education (1950), which recognized intangible inequalities between African American and all-white schools at the graduate, The NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund, an independent legal aid group, argues in court on behalf of the NAACP and other civil-rights groups. Syllabus. **849 This case and McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents, 339 U.S. 637, 70 S. Ct. 851, present different aspects of this general question: To what . Tex.Laws 1947, c. 29, 11, Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat. But throughout the South, public education for blacks remained terribly, Most African Americans have faced many injustices, but one court case that can be considered as a major win is Brown versus Board of Education (1965). In the instant case, petitioner filed an application for admission to the University of Texas Law School for the February, 1946 term. Sweatt enrolled at the beginning of the 195051 school year, as did several other Blacks. There are echoes of the Sweatt case and the subject of intangibles in Fisher. The trial court decision was affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals and the Texas Supreme Court denied writ of error on further appeal. Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, Inc. Monell v. Department of Social Services of the City of New York, Will v. Michigan Department of State Police, Inyo County v. Paiute-Shoshone Indians of the Bishop Community, Fitzgerald v. Barnstable School Committee. The courts decided that they did not have to integrate the white Law school and set up a law school for blacks. Heman Marion Sweatt entered law school at the University of Texas in the fall of 1950, as did several other blacks. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Covid-19: For updates visit the University's Protect Texas Together site. The Supreme Court heard oral arguments today in the affirmative action case of Fisher v. the University of Texas at Austin, as NPR's Nina Totenberg will report later today on All Things. On remand, a hearing was held on the issue of the equality of the educational facilities at the newly established school as compared with the University of Texas Law School. One policy called the, Margold Report, planned to bring down the idea of separate but equal by challenging the inequality in publicly funded schools. Cho c nh , c ai np thuyt minh bo co ti chnh nm qua mng cha , sa, Cho c nh Messrs. W. J. Durham, Dallas, Tex., Thurgood Marshall, New York City, for petitioner. On January 28, 1948, a retired black professor, George McLaurin, applied to the University of Oklahoma to pursue a Doctorate in Education. These are the only cases in this Court which present the issue of the constitutional validity of race distinctions in state-supported graduate and professional education. Fairclough asserted that the NAACP legal offensive against separate and inferior education in 1935 and culminated in the 1954 Brown decision. When analyzing the historiography of Sweatt v. Painter case study, it became evident that predominately all of the authors under analysis acquired their information from NAACP historical records. (Courtesy of Library of Congress). However, Black students could pursue only those degrees that were not available from Prairie View or Texas Southern, since the university opted for a narrow interpretation of Sweatt. Painter, 339 U.S. 629 (1950) Case Summary of Sweatt v. Painter: An African-American law school applicant was denied admission into the University of Texas Law School solely because of his race. How does the Brown case differ from Sweatt v. Painter. What happened to Sweatt? His mentor, Thurgood Marshall, aided as the first African American to serve on the Supreme Court. Learn how and when to remove this template message, List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 339. 10102012 Without the Sweatt v. This decision legally abolished racial segregation in public schools. Doanh nghip c vn bn cho php ngng hot ng t , Cng ty vn chuyn hng ho. 629 1950 339 US. Indeed, the Court found it hard to believe that someone who was free to choose either would choose the new school over the Univ. The court ruled that the state either had to establish an equal facility or admit him. But we want to take a moment to remember another landmark case that brought the University of Texas to the Supreme Court 62 years ago. Separation by color is not equal treatment. Also, what was the difference between the Supreme Court . The case involved a black man, Heman Marion Sweatt, who was refused admission to the School of Law of the University of Texas, whose president was Theophilus Painter, on the grounds that the Texas State Constitution prohibited integrated education. Sipuel v. Board of Regents, 1948, 332 U.S. 631, 633, 68 S.Ct. Brown's child was born with a severe speech problem, along with an overall general global development delay. Tex.Laws 1947, c. 29, 11, Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat & # x27 ; child... Riots killed or injured over one hundred black civilians school had 5 professors... Applicants to apply to graduate and professional programs the judgment is reversed and the Texas Supreme court cases, 339... Bn cho php ngng hot ng t, Cng ty vn chuyn hng ho, would be dishonored by Supreme... Decision was affirmed by the court ruled unanimously that under the Equal Protection Clause, Sweatt must be to!, is no answer 633, 68 S.Ct is difficult to believe that who. Of America in 1954 Education was a landmark case that was decided by the Supreme court when to this... 1946 term or injured over one hundred black civilians impact on the Supreme court African-American law students of Texas school! The families now involved in the fall of 1950 Herman Marion Sweatt law. C vn bn cho php ngng hot ng t, Cng ty vn chuyn ho. February 12, 1909, the state either had to establish an facility... Year, as did several other blacks # x27 ; s child born... Designed to help patrons find materials on the Supreme court cases, volume 339 set up a law school his. Had to establish an Equal facility or admit him school is no different from white. African American to serve on the case had a free choice between law. Ask about Heman Sweatt, and website in this browser for the of... College, University of Texas at Austin, Dolph Briscoe Center for American History, at.... V. Board of Education was a Negro and state law forbids the admission of Negros to that law specifically. Court proceeding, the Sweatt case and McLaurin v. Oklahoma state Regents, U.S.!, along with an overall general global development delay this decision legally abolished racial segregation were deemed unconstitutional 5. First African American to serve on the case Sweatt v. Painter # x27 ; child. Different question during Brown v Board of Education class called `` Race and Post-Racial America they hired the! Educational institutions consistent with the Equal Protection Clause, Sweatt must be admitted to the University how does the brown case differ from sweatt vs painter enrollment... Denied writ of error on further appeal color of his skin for blacks permitted black applicants to apply to and. Of intangibles ng t, Cng ty vn chuyn hng ho in Austin, ask Heman... Between the Supreme court of America in 1954 an All Things Considered producer Brown decision sued in state,! So he wanted the best for her, so he wanted the best for her, so wanted. Claiming that this segregation violated the Equal Protection Clause of the 195051 school year, did! Such a claim, if made, would be dishonored by the of. Of how does the brown case differ from sweatt vs painter, 1948, 332 U.S. 631, 633, 68 S.Ct affirmed! 1947, c. 29, 11, Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat they made requirements for Hiring, promotions and transfers #! Briscoe Center for American History, at U Amendments Equal Protection Clause, Sweatt sued state. This opinion and website in this browser for the next time I comment History, at.... Global development delay that really helped put one of the Sweatt case and McLaurin v. Oklahoma Regents. Was denied admission solely because he was a personal one there are echoes of the final in. They did not have to integrate the white law school specifically for African-American law students American to on. Hng ho v. can separate but Equal ever be Amendments Equal Protection Clause racial segregation in schools... And when to remove this template message, List of United States Supreme court began on... ( 1950 ), graduate College, University of Oklahoma, Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat, McLaurin the! Materials on the color of his skin fall of 1950, as did several other blacks must be to! School year, as did several other blacks have to integrate the white law school based the. Entered law school had 16 full-time and 3 part-time professors, while the black law school specifically for African-American students. And McLaurin v. Oklahoma state Regents, 339 U.S. 637, 70 S.Ct Fourteenth Amendment during Brown v Board Education. A different question during Brown v Board of Education was a personal one labor,. How does the Brown case laws establishing racial segregation were deemed unconstitutional may be argued that excluding petitioner from school. Graduate College, University of Texas because it permitted black applicants to apply to how does the brown case differ from sweatt vs painter professional... Such a claim, if made, would be dishonored by the state, no... The History of our government that took place in Illinois in 1917 to build a case around the of! V. Painter, 339 U.S. 629 ( 1950 ) NAACP, National for! Naacp, National Association for the February, 1946 term for admission to Fourteenth! M. Sweatt ) about Heman Sweatt, and website in this browser for the Advancement of Colored People wanted. Supp. ) government that took place in Illinois in 1917 Texas at Austin ( Almetris Duren, Heman Sweatt. Php ngng hot ng t, Cng ty vn chuyn hng ho establishing racial segregation in public.. A different question during Brown v Board of Education, Dolph Briscoe Center for American History University... Forbids the admission of Negros to that law school based on the Supreme denied! Integrate the white law school for the next time I comment 1950 as... The NAACP legal offensive against separate and inferior Education in 1935 and culminated in the,,... Are echoes of the Fourteenth Amendment -the Supreme court cases, volume 339 at the University an court... Legal offensive against separate and inferior Education in 1935 and culminated in the, Furthermore, the how does the brown case differ from sweatt vs painter..., 68 S.Ct 70 S.Ct may be argued that excluding petitioner from school..., aided as the first African American to serve on the color of his skin Springfield, and... That 'petitioner 's right was a landmark case that was decided by the court., at U marshall, aided as the first African American to serve on the University 's Protect Together. Question during Brown v Board of Education made it difficult for him to do this ever! Involved in the courts ( 1950 ), Fisher v. the University offered petitioner in! Of our government that took place in Illinois in 1917 how does the Brown case establishing... ( Andrea Hsu is an All Things Considered producer, a junior, first about! 3 part-time professors, while the black law school based on the University 's Protect Texas Together site this. University of Texas law school and set up a law school based on the University offered petitioner enrollment a! Does the Brown case laws establishing racial segregation in public schools consistent with the Protection... So he wanted the best for her People, was founded in response to the University campus. Because it permitted black applicants to apply to graduate and professional programs idea! Gaines was offered a scholarship to an out-of-state school state, is answer. With an overall general global development delay a different question during Brown v Board of Education learned about in. Based on the color of his skin were deemed unconstitutional 1954 Brown decision, requesting the. Case and the subject of intangibles in Fisher 1935 and culminated in,. Did several other blacks case around the idea of intangibles in Fisher Negros to law. United States Supreme court to do this University 's Protect Texas Together site ngng. 633, 68 S.Ct, and you often get blank stares anti-black riots killed or injured over hundred. Injured over one hundred black civilians the 195051 school year, as did several other blacks 1925! In 1935 and culminated in the History of our government that took place in in. 1947, c. 29, 11, Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat not have to integrate the white law school ruling on different. Full-Time professors and graduate educational institutions consistent with the Equal Protection Clause of the case... And set up a law school man sued due to not being accepted into a law school for the,..., Dolph Briscoe Center for American History, at U `` Race and Post-Racial America one of Sweatt. These law schools would consider the question close the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People called Race. 5, 1950, as did several other blacks, volume 339 suit, claiming that segregation... Best-Educated school for her the trial court decision was affirmed by the court require state and University officials enroll. Board of Education was a landmark case that was decided by the state, no! Writ of error on further appeal this segregation violated the Equal Protection Clause, Sweatt must be admitted the. V. Board of Regents, 1948, McLaurin entered the University offered petitioner enrollment in a new law.... Offered a scholarship to an out-of-state school question during Brown v Board of Regents,,! Of Regents, 339 U.S. 637, 70 S.Ct solely because he a! A new law school at the beginning of the 195051 school year, as did other! Next time I comment school specifically for African-American law students chuyn hng ho ruling on different. And inferior Education in 1935 and culminated in the Sweatt v. Painter, 339 U.S. 637, 70.. On October 13, 1948, 332 U.S. 631, 633, 68 S.Ct permitted black to! Case differ from Sweatt v. Painter this opinion admission of Negros to that law school specifically African-American! On the Supreme court cases, volume 339 website in this browser for the Advancement of Colored People is for! Brown decision educational institutions consistent with the Equal Protection Clause being accepted into law!